Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (540 Views)
Posted by: Michael D. (IP Logged)
Date: April 09, 2007 08:38PM

Dana666 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Some are saying the Wood wasn't a good prep, but
> comparing the times to the handicap race for older
> horses later on, the Wood doesn't seem slow at
> all. One would expect the older horses to go
> faster, but it doesn't seem they went that much
> faster. Anyone have an idea what T-G number Magna
> Graduate got and what number NoBiz got (and more
> importantly what are par numbers for those
> races)?
>
> Wood: 23.28, 23.98, 23.76, 25.12, 12.44 (1:49.46)
>
> Older
> Stakes: 23.78, 22.22, 23.38, 24.96, 12.70
> (1:48.10)
>
> NoBiz looked very healthy to me and very stout
> like he's coming up to the triple crown in a good
> way. He certainly didn't look to have spent
> himself at all in the Wood either. Anyone have any
> thoughts on this???



Dana, nobiz ran the final furlong five lengths slower than you think he did.



Subject Written By Posted
The Wood Was Slow??? (806 Views) Dana666 04/09/2007 08:25PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (540 Views) Michael D. 04/09/2007 08:38PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (552 Views) mchmura44 04/09/2007 08:58PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (547 Views) Michael D. 04/09/2007 09:03PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (500 Views) spa 04/09/2007 10:10PM
Beyer Thinks So (536 Views) Sandreadis 04/09/2007 10:30PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (528 Views) jbelfior 04/09/2007 11:15PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (494 Views) spa 04/10/2007 01:50AM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (474 Views) miff 04/10/2007 10:24AM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (470 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2007 01:19PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (447 Views) Uncle Buck 04/10/2007 02:12PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (518 Views) miff 04/10/2007 02:24PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (424 Views) Silver Charm 04/10/2007 03:12PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (465 Views) miff 04/10/2007 04:53PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (451 Views) fkach 04/10/2007 05:01PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (485 Views) flushedstraight 04/10/2007 05:42PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (466 Views) Sandreadis 04/10/2007 06:37PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (469 Views) RICH 04/11/2007 08:19AM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (412 Views) fkach 04/11/2007 06:23PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (401 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/11/2007 08:44PM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (481 Views) big18741 04/10/2007 08:23AM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (484 Views) RICH 04/10/2007 08:27AM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (486 Views) miff 04/10/2007 10:15AM
Re: The Wood Was Slow??? (454 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 04/11/2007 08:00PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.