Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
The Beyer Conclusion (995 Views)
Posted by: Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: May 02, 2007 09:48PM

[size=large]Having read his books and considered his opinion, tonight the reality of Andrew Beyer settled in upon me. Anyone that has followed this game for any number of years has to have observed Andy flailing away with the Derby. Andy reinvented Speed Figures in a methodical attempt to bring consistency to the game and logic to his wagers. Without being able to recall the precise Year and Comment, Andy has very much been a student of statistics, or in other words, a follower of Derby trends in placing his wagers. With all of his logic, statistics and trends, Andrew Beyer is Nada at Churchill Downs on the 1st Saturday in May.

Today the trend that is important to him is the 2YO race foundation. Last year it very well may have been no more than 4 weeks layoff and I believe that was one of his contentions. Thereafter, he predicted a Barbaro Triple Crown. Three years ago, when the gelded Funny Cide won the Derby I'm nearly certain he felt a Gelding was not a statistical edge wager. Two years ago he selected Bellamy Road because that one was a statistical beast upon his last Beyer Number.

In conclusion, Andy's belief system can be condensed to this: "There are ways of shortcutting the full evaluation process in selecting a winner" There are shortcuts to rule out certain variables to increase ones methodical focus upon those that "can" win. His whole life has been devoted to reducing a horse to an equation and he's not going to change now.

Andy Beyer says that Curlin cannot win and will finish worse than 10th because he never raced as a 2YO. If Curlin gets pinned in the clubhouse turn and finishes 8th Andy will likely feel empowered by the mathematics in the continuing statistical trend. Maybe Curlin will not win, but trends are broken by the right horse in the right place at the right time. Such was the case of Barbaro last year and Lammatara in the English Derby some years back. (A Derby won upon only one other race is my recollection.) Both horses broke the mold and reset the trends. Such events are anathema to methodical statisticians whose minds need to arrange the data and require structure and order in attempts to limit what they perceive as the chaos.

http://www.drf.com/drfNewsArticle.do?NID=84537&subs=0&arc=0

Will talk about the race next[/size]



Subject Written By Posted
The Beyer Conclusion (995 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 05/02/2007 09:48PM
Re: The Beyer Conclusion (589 Views) spa 05/02/2007 10:00PM
Re: The Beyer Conclusion (584 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 05/02/2007 10:08PM
Re: The Beyer Conclusion (603 Views) NoCarolinaTony 05/02/2007 10:15PM
Re: The Beyer Conclusion (525 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 05/03/2007 12:06AM
Re: The Beyer Conclusion (548 Views) NoCarolinaTony 05/03/2007 12:13AM
Re: The Beyer Conclusion (512 Views) jmetro 05/03/2007 12:37AM
Re: The Beyer Conclusion (469 Views) fkach 05/03/2007 08:52AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.