Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: 1986-2006 Simple Study Of Horses That Ran In The Derby And The Preakness. (659 Views)
Posted by: SoCalMan2 (IP Logged)
Date: May 18, 2007 08:44AM

First, off, I am a wimp and probably skipping the Preakness because, to me, I cannot see an edge other than throwing out Curlin and thinking that Circular Quay will represent value. If this race were not the Preakness, it is the typical type of race that my handicapping says to skip.

The problem is that I have a hard time throwing out either Street Sense or Hard Spun. At the same time, there is simply no value in betting them. I recognize that the study shows that they are serious bounce candidates. However, the study focuses on something called minus 1. As clear and straight as minus 1 may seem, it is not so simple. A minus 1 in 2007 is very different from a minus 1 in 1997. The point is not the number whatever that number is, but rather the concept of an outrageous performance in the context of the relevant norms. An outside performance 5 years ago could be a normal performance today. When you go into the archives and look at the sheets of horses like War Emblem, Funny Cide, Real Quiet, Charismatic, Silver Charm and others, you will see horses that made a top effort in the Derby and were able to hold that form for the two weeks necessary to the Preakness. If you were to knock 3 points off the scale back then, all of a sudden you have a bunch of minus ones that did not bounce on two weeks rest. The key to me is trying to see how the big effort number fits in with the rest of the context of the particular horse's sheet. Unfortunately, that does not seem to help me with this year's Preakness.

On Circular Quay, what a weird sheet. If you were to imagine that instead of the sheet we have, he ran the Lousiana Derby figure late in his two year old year....then took two months of before starting his three year old season, you would see a horse that had a minus 1 as his two year old top who came back to a zero in his first race off the layoff. Coming into his second start, you would expect him to really move forward (even setting a new top).

Anyway, these are all random thoughts....wish I could translate them into a sound way to bet this years' race.



Subject Written By Posted
1986-2006 Simple Study Of Horses That Ran In The Derby And The Preakness. (908 Views) gohorse10 05/18/2007 01:35AM
Re: 1986-2006 Simple Study Of Horses That Ran In The Derby And The Preakness. (659 Views) SoCalMan2 05/18/2007 08:44AM
Re: 1986-2006 Simple Study Of Horses That Ran In The Derby And The Preakness. (521 Views) flushedstraight 05/18/2007 10:25AM
Re: 1986-2006 Simple Study Of Horses That Ran In The Derby And The Preakness. (531 Views) gohorse10 05/18/2007 11:03AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.