Re: Compromised How? (885 Views)
Posted by:
Alydar in California (IP Logged)
Date: August 22, 2002 09:38PM
David wrote: "The final time for race two should have been typed as 150.4, not 149.4."
A second here, a second there, and pretty soon we're talking about serious time.
"My point was that final time of the race is perhaps less important than the relative speed of the final fractions, particularly if we have a situation with only 1 or 2 turf races that day. I would be much more confident that slow pace was the cause of a slow figure if the internal fractions look out of whack than if the final time appears slow. I'm still awaiting Jerry's take on that."
Asked and answered. If there is only one turf race that day, the issue is moot.