Re: Circumstantial Evidence (469 Views)
Posted by:
sighthound (IP Logged)
Date: August 11, 2007 03:00AM
Oh, I don't know, Barry.
"Drugs", and "they are using drugs", is such a broad, general, unsupportable accusation ...
Certainly both chuckles and alm must be educated enough regarding drug use and misuse to suspect particular substances are being used.
I would like to hear from both of them what specific drugs or substances they know of, that improves a horses performance markedly, that isn't tested for under current NYRA, that would escape detection under current track procedures, that they obviously suspect repeated useage of in a variety of horses?
Certainly they have some sense of this to support their opinion.
I doubt they are just "throwing out" repeated general accusations without any basis in pharmacologic reality at all.
Are they?