A conspiracy is an inchoate or incomplete crime. What we are discussing is "fait accompli".

The track played well to the right type of horse in two races. It was able to produce a fast time for a fast horse, but it was not a crazy speed track. Plech's post race comments that he was taking Lawyer Ron Breeders Cup Classic is additional evidence it was not a pure "carrying" track.

"Horsemanship"? hmmmm, As soon as he made the Derby in 2000 with four entries they've been fawning all over him with "horsemanship" comments. He was 32 at the time. I'll state again, his "horsemanship" appears to have developed when he took on "Dr." Steve Allday.

I've heard a lot of reasons to play ostrich about Plech's antics, but I have to tell you claiming the exercise rider ruined Lawyer Ron's regimen is by far the most comical. Where did you come up with that crazy conspiracy? The doper himself I bet. And some accuse others of believing anything.

I've put some good stuff on the table, but here we are without much of an interest in digging deeper. Barry you are in a position to discreetly ask the man when he took on his star employee and Tgraph has the data to shed light upon the "allegations" that I am leveling.

To Catch a Crook, you have to investigate him.

CtMC

Barry Irwin Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Clown: the track that Lawyer Ron earned his
> negative number on was one of the strangest
> surfaces seen in a long time. For you to keep
> trotting this up shows that you just do not want
> to face facts.
>
> You also don't want to hear anything about the
> horsemanship that brought about improvement in
> that colt after he was no longer ridden by an
> incompetent exercise rider.
>
> Like all conspiracy theorists, you just want to
> twist reality to fit a nice, tidy little theory.