Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: A Lot Less Than 8 Feet. (814 Views)
Posted by: David Patent (IP Logged)
Date: August 28, 2002 08:41PM

Aly,

You must be following the Shetland Pony Circuit.

The standard that has long been used in racing is that 1/5 of a second equals 1 length. We now know that is not quite right, as horses run at different speeds during the race, but what follows is a good approximation:

A good horse can run 6f in 1:10. That is 38.7 mph. At 38.7 mph, the horse travels about 57 feet per second (38.7*5280/3600). At 57 feet per second, 1/5 of a second = 11.4 feet.

Earlier in the race, fractions are faster and later in the race they are slower. Some horses run faster than 38.7 mph and some run significantly slower.

Obviously the speed at which horses run does not affect its length (thus the roughness of the assumption), but unless a horse is a small little mule, 8-9 feet is going to lead to some Suffolk Downs in the winter-like (or Perfect Drift in the Belmont-like)assumptions about the speed of racehorses.

And for a reality check -- when was the last time you stood next to a thoroughbred? The distance from the nose on an outstretched neck to the tail has got to be more than 11-12 feet for a fully grown horse.

Anybody care to weigh in on this?



Subject Written By Posted
D. Patent: Nothing To Prove? (1288 Views) Mall 08/26/2002 05:49PM
Re: D. Patent: Nothing To Prove? (764 Views) David Patent 08/27/2002 09:25PM
A Lot Less Than 8 Feet. (806 Views) Mall 08/27/2002 10:16PM
Re: A Lot Less Than 8 Feet. (826 Views) TGJB 08/28/2002 04:24PM
Re: A Lot Less Than 8 Feet. (807 Views) David Patent 08/28/2002 04:28PM
Re: A Lot Less Than 8 Feet. (768 Views) Alydar in California 08/28/2002 06:24PM
Re: A Lot Less Than 8 Feet. (814 Views) David Patent 08/28/2002 08:41PM
Re: A Lot Less Than 8 Feet. (853 Views) Alydar in California 08/28/2002 10:21PM
Re: A Lot Less Than 8 Feet. (771 Views) Mall 08/28/2002 11:25PM
Re: A Lot Less Than 12 Feet. (829 Views) David G. Patent 08/29/2002 04:38AM
Just In Time? (865 Views) Mall 08/29/2002 09:04PM
Exciting Promotion (806 Views) David Patent 08/29/2002 09:32PM
Re: Exciting Promotion (796 Views) Alydar in California 08/30/2002 12:25AM
Re: D. Patent: Nothing To Prove? (794 Views) TGJB 08/28/2002 04:23PM
Re: D. Patent: Nothing To Prove? (813 Views) David Patent 08/28/2002 04:32PM
Re: D. Patent: Nothing To Prove? (780 Views) Point Given Gal-Michelle 08/30/2002 12:56PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.