Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Selective Prosecution? (780 Views)
Posted by: Alydar in California (IP Logged)
Date: November 22, 2002 11:34PM

Mall wrote:

"The idea that one cannot offer an opinion on the judgment of a woman jockey without 1st, or at the same time, also condemning male jockeys makes even less sense..."

The idea that you would bash a depressed girl while refusing to criticize the countless riders who did essentially the same thing, and in effect established the precedent for keeping quiet about such things, strikes me as odd. Since we lack statutes, think of this as common law. Julie's conduct can't be judged properly without examining the precedents.

"makes even less sense than the implication that I am a sexist."

To conclude this, you would have to put emphasis on a word I avoided emphasizing. Read the sentence again, this time putting the emphasis on "find." I do NOT think you are a sexist, but I can understand how you read it that way.

"And while we're on the subject of sexism, which has nothing to do with the question on the table, isn't one of the basic tenets of feminist ideology that men demean women when they are presented as passive objects in male fantasies?"

This is such a preposterous joke that I can only respond in kind. In my best fantasy, Halle Berry is not even remotely passive. (Be sure to see the cover of "Cosmopolitan" before it gets yanked.)

"Again, the question you still haven't addressed"

Bob Barry handled this beautifully. I would like to associate myself with his remarks. Be fair, Mall.

"I am not in a position to address your comment that I am "skipping history as tragedy and heading straight to history as farce" because I have no idea what you are talking about."

That's a famous line from Karl Marx. History repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. You are skipping over all the precedents and attacking only Julie, and it's farcical.

"This started out with me expressing my disapproval, for safety reasons, of Miss Krone's decision to continue riding, without telling anyone, after she was diagnosed as clinincally depressed and after she started taking powerful presciption drugs."

You did more than that, Mall. You didn't care for her Hall of Fame speech, either. Don't pretend this is only about safety.

"There has never been any suggestion of prosecution, never any suggestion that her decision was a crime"

It's pretty obvious that we're not in court. "Selective prosecution" was a metaphor. I have a hard time believing that you didn't know that.

"In light of the circumstances, do you agree or disagree with her decision to continue riding?"

If riding makes Julie feel better, I want her to ride. Now give me your lengthy condemnations of the other sinners, starting at the top.



Subject Written By Posted
Mallpractice (1351 Views) Alydar in California 11/20/2002 05:01AM
Re: Mallpractice (797 Views) Mall 11/20/2002 11:23AM
Re: Mallpractice (806 Views) Alydar in California 11/20/2002 08:59PM
Re: Mallpractice (782 Views) Mall 11/20/2002 09:25PM
Re: Mallpractice (827 Views) Alydar in California 11/20/2002 09:46PM
Re: Mallpractice (805 Views) TGJB 11/20/2002 10:05PM
Re: Mallpractice (840 Views) Alydar in California 11/20/2002 10:22PM
Re: Mallpractice (777 Views) Mall 11/21/2002 12:36PM
Re: Mallpractice (804 Views) Bob Barry 11/21/2002 01:32PM
Re: Mallpractice (858 Views) Silver Charm 11/21/2002 03:34PM
Re: Mallpractice (715 Views) Alydar in California 11/21/2002 05:43PM
Re: Mallpractice (803 Views) Alydar in California 11/21/2002 11:01PM
Re: Mallpractice (831 Views) Alydar in California 11/21/2002 11:27PM
Re: Mallpractice (790 Views) BB 11/23/2002 02:23AM
Re: Mallpractice (769 Views) Alydar in California 11/23/2002 06:09AM
Truly sinful (797 Views) Jurmala Berzins 11/22/2002 01:32AM
Selective Prosecution? (784 Views) Mall 11/22/2002 02:15PM
Re: Selective Prosecution? (780 Views) Alydar in California 11/22/2002 11:34PM
Mallpractice on the Record (765 Views) Alydar in California 11/23/2002 01:24AM
If Memory Serves. (773 Views) Mall 11/23/2002 12:24PM
Thus Spake Mall (838 Views) Alydar in California 11/23/2002 10:34PM
Re: Mallpractice (773 Views) Scott V 11/22/2002 03:16PM
Re: Mallpractice (767 Views) Mall 11/22/2002 06:17PM
Re: Mallpractice (808 Views) TGJB 11/22/2002 07:15PM
Re: Mallpractice (861 Views) JimP 11/20/2002 09:12PM
Alydar Being Alydar. (785 Views) Mall 11/25/2002 01:38PM
Re: Alydar Being Alydar. (821 Views) Mark O'Keeffe 11/25/2002 09:20PM
Re: Alydar Being Alydar. (818 Views) TGJB 11/25/2002 09:31PM
A few words from Julie (761 Views) BB 11/26/2002 03:04AM
Get thee to a nunnery (809 Views) Alydar in California 11/26/2002 12:33AM
Re: Get thee to a nunnery (746 Views) Mark O'Keeffe 11/26/2002 01:01AM
where credit is due (766 Views) BB 11/26/2002 03:22AM
Re: where credit is due (792 Views) Alydar in California 11/26/2002 04:17AM
Re: julie (835 Views) gaaaaaining grooooound 12/07/2002 09:18PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.