Re: Not that there's anything wrong with it (781 Views)
Posted by:
TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: December 09, 2002 07:40PM
I (and others) have advocated listing vets on the program, which would be a start. Problem is, one vet could be the vet of record, and another could be coming around to treat the horse. Trainers have what I think is called the "ultimate insurer" rule, or something like that-- they are responsible if there is a positive, not the vet. So if a trainer is listed on the program, he's training the horse-- not true of vets.
TGJB