Actually, I don't really think you adressed my questions, or at least all of them, but it doesn't matter now. Too bad, because I was curious, "ahas" aside. I have no idea whether the methodology was correct or how much difference would be meaningful (we know that a 350 batting average is way better than 250, but what's way "better" here, even if one takes the position that something is better?), but it would have been interesting, and sparked discussion. Which would have been good, as long as no-one got sandbagged.



TGJB