Re: It was a crying "sham"e (861 Views)
Posted by:
Bystander (IP Logged)
Date: June 02, 2003 04:03PM
Agree with the whole post - it is just sad that you had to say that Sham's time "was" second best in history. I remember being pissed off with Monarchos's derby time because it "unseated" Sham as being the second fastest derby of all time. I am curious what the fastest Ragozin/Brown Derby numbers of all time have been. I am also curious what the fastest losing number has been. It is conceivable that the fast derby of all time was actually a losing effort.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.