He's got all the idiosyncrasies of a Sheet player. Foul mouth (You can take the boy out of Brooklyn but you can't take the Brooklyn outta the boy) usually wrong about everything that goes into print and hell...he's just plain ugly. That man is an ugly individual. He looks like the Sheet players I've seen ... a short, squat and rotund demonic troll.

Mark O'Keefe...stay tuned...I have a Cupi Doll I may unveil before the Belmont to ensure Frankelstein changes his ways.

You know what I love most about this board now? The lack of carping over words like "Cupi". Why has it gotten so civil here? lol

Jerry, I hope you use the interrogatory format (That means mailed questions for perusing Sheet players :) ) to your advantage to answer why your numbers are superior to Sheets numbers. When the questions get circular, as they tend to do with ur perimeter friend at least we won't have to read the repetition. :)

I think one of the inquiries will pertain to figures over the years. I'm really not sure you can compare horses from different eras ... even using figures...so many variables that impact figures exist, some of which we do not understand and others that aren't quantifiable. I saw Affirmed...he was a good horse but Seattle Slew had a 7 derby number (on Rags I believe With horrible trouble) and beat Affirmed the next year. I've handicapped a lot of races. Era shifting really isn’t possible all u can do is project. Good figures are good figures in their year. If you get to that result and have an ability to separate horses that are running against each other you've accomplished all that is necessary.