Jeez HP, what is it with you kiss as*, Jerry Bitter lackeys?

You guys are so paranoid and insecure. Now you are calling me a liar too. I'll never say I support any TG analysis again on this board. I wonder if YOU can read? The analysis did support Ethan Man. As Jerry likes to point out, the analysis doesn't tell you who to bet (but somehow my Derby analysis should, what a crock!). However, if you didn't read the Lexington analysis and come away thinking that Ethan Man was the best of the group then you need to take some reading comprehension remedial courses.

I agreed with it, and like the analysis, thought there was a degree of vulnerability with him. In a short field like that I have made many, many big scores by catching the favorite third over two nice prices on top. It would have happened here if EM could have limped into third. I'm sorry this wagering strategy offends you. Seems like your problem to me because I like it.

I'll also never tell you about anytime I ever make a score at the track. I wouldn't have done it here (and certainly didn't brag about making a score), but I only told you I won by prefacing that I lost quite a bit on the Lexington first. But, you guys are way too paranoid and insecure to hear anything like that.

The more I think about it, it's laughable. You think I was bragging by telling you about two small wins? Too funny. You don't believe the 5-1 shot in the last? You slay me! Think I give a rat's as*? LOL Bragging would be my telling you I made thousands or hit several tri's and super's. That didn't happen, but see the difference? But you are just too ignorant to realize that. So, I'm done with you HP.

Get your last shot in (like the singing wacko, Excitable Boy) because I'll ignore your foolish rants from this point forward. Me? I'll stick with my analysis and trying to have normal conversations and an exchange of opinions and information with handicappers.

What a couple of lunatics! :0)