TreadHead Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> P-Dub, you are mentally challenged, I'm really not
> sure how else to state it.
>
> I NEVER, in any shape or form, said that all
> horses who race in California and have success
> can't have success away from California. I very
> clearly stated that there are 2 buckets of horses,
> one where surface doesn't matter, and another, of
> which there are several examples, where
> exceptional performances on glib surfaces aren't
> fully duplicated on fairer tracks.
>
> I also openly stated there is no data to show us
> what CC is going to do and anyone speculating that
> he will take to it fine (you) or won't take to it
> as well (me) is doing little more than making a
> guess at this point.
>
> I would ask you to fully read and comprehend my
> discussion points before throwing up arguments
> against strawmans that have completely twisted and
> changed the original meanings of my words, but it
> seems pretty apparent that you clearly just enjoy
> arguing, even if you are arguing against yourself
> with a strawman you made up.


You were very clear in stating new dirt vs old dirt. In between your usual snide comments, you specifically stated the horses I mentioned didn't count.

So in fact you used a 3 yr old data base to make your claims.

JB and others disagreed with you, explained in very clear terms why. Unfortunately, as you have shown with yet another insult, you are a little too emotionally attached to your point of view.

That being the case, we will just have to agree to disagree. Have a wonderful day sir.

P-Dub