Re: O'Neill's horses to run in assistant's name (460 Views)
Posted by:
Rick B. (IP Logged)
Date: October 16, 2014 06:30AM
Dana666 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Of course, who wouldn't?! Right now, for example,
> Rudy R is on fire at Belmont--yeah, I'll take the
> money, but the issue I have is playing
> super-trainers or juice trainers or whatever you
> want to call them carries inherent risk b/c you're
> not really handicapping, and you never really know
> when the switch is turned on so to speak --it's a
> path frought with disaster for the gambler and the
> game. It's hard to explain but in the long run
> it's a really horrible way to bet. I mean why the
> hell buy sheets or even pps??? The game just
> requires integrity and I don't know how they'll
> ever restore that.
Dana? You are overthinking it.
Just cash. That is hard enough without worrying
about "integrity issues".