Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (780 Views)
Posted by: miff (IP Logged)
Date: June 14, 2016 02:30PM

The "he didnt like the track" argument is very weak. Exagg handled 7 different surfaces/tracks with aplomb.His Belmont X was the classic, over the top, cumulative effect,if there ever was one.



Subject Written By Posted
Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (1342 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 06:02PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (937 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 06:16PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (953 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 06:39PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (916 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 06:47PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (859 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:10PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (793 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:15PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (813 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (823 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:31PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (903 Views) miff 06/13/2016 07:37PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (784 Views) RICH 06/14/2016 06:07AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (1024 Views) miff 06/13/2016 06:48PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (950 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:21PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (868 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:36PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (781 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 08:16PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (857 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 08:23PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (861 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 08:55PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (851 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 09:28PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (930 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 09:58AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (831 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 10:01AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (785 Views) miff 06/14/2016 10:20AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (818 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 10:51AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (806 Views) miff 06/14/2016 11:40AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (855 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 11:50AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (856 Views) miff 06/14/2016 12:03PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (900 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 12:45PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (815 Views) jimbo66 06/14/2016 12:53PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (709 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 01:39PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (778 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 01:59PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (753 Views) miff 06/14/2016 02:20PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (786 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 02:34PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (829 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 02:43PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (682 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 06:35PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (846 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 07:26PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (710 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 02:25PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (750 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 11:29AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (772 Views) miff 06/14/2016 11:52AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (788 Views) jp702006 06/13/2016 08:34PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (771 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 08:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (886 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:22PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (911 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (837 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:45PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (913 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 08:36PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (588 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 02:20PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (780 Views) miff 06/14/2016 02:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (720 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 03:28PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (789 Views) Tavasco 06/14/2016 03:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (768 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 03:35PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (734 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 03:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (776 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 03:44PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (673 Views) richiebee 06/14/2016 03:57PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (722 Views) sekrah 06/14/2016 05:54PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (714 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 06:25PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.