Lucy,

You really must get your facts right. I didn't reply to Len's Whitney post - it was to an inane comment by Patrick Suppes. If he hadn't had posted neither would I. And why is it embarrassing? Is fighting your corner embarassing in your book? And why was Len's Whitney alalysis so superior to TG's - am I missing something or did Seattle Fitz finish second after all?

You say 'Len made a nice pick of roses in may at 7-1 in a very tough race' but he actually said the horse was value at a 12-1 ML. Would he have thought the same if the ML was 7-1? TG's analysis gave four of the first five finishers - are you saying that doesn't compare? And as for JB boxing half the field, Len suggested five horses as a 'use in exotics.' In your book using five is less expensive than four I presume.

George

PS: Everyone knows who I am - have you got the balls to tell us who you are? Personally I think pseudonyms on the internet are great fun but others get upset about it so if you want to play you've got to follow the rules too. Otherwise get back to the Kool-Aid.