Call him out on it. DRF is in the middle of a pretty serious "Ethical Debate". Now is the time to require integrity whether it be in trainers or in house. I can't read the Rag Board, but I can read between the lines and know you guys can too.

I haven't seen a set of the Rags in well over a decade. My brief exposure with their clientele leads me to believe they don't put the voluminous information in them that TGraph does. Thorograph is close to becoming a stand alone tool to compete with the Daily Racing Form. (Albeit a BMW 8 series vs. a GM)Could there be an unholy alliance budding?

You can't allow Saddam to join forces with Al Qaeda and become the next Hitler, Jerry. Its time to be Bushesque and squash it in it's infancy, regardless of the infants. At least your calls for integrity won't be hypocritical and you'll be going after the right guy.

http://www.riggsbank.com/Discover_Riggs/may31_00.html


http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/banking/2004-05-14-riggs-fine_x.htm

TGJB wrote:

> So Marc "responded" on the Rag board. He didn't withdraw it,
> and he didn't apologize-- he explained how he was right all the
> time, in typical cute Marc fashion
>
> Marc, neither George nor I think you are an idiot. We think
> worse of you than that-- that you did it in full knowledge of
> what you were doing, for reasons I made clear in my open
> letter. Your response is an attempt to get off the hook with
> your employers-- who would be livid, as I would if anyone who
> worked for me pulled this crap-- and you are hoping the
> inference one can draw (that Michelson did in fact use TG) from
> your BS post is enough to satisfy me, and that I'll take the
> high road, and not take this to them.
>
> And you know what? I'm going to drop it. You're not worth it.
> But three strikes you're out, and I'm not kidding. Stop
> defaming us, either explicitly or implicitly. And quit while
> you're ahead.
>
>



Post Edited (02-01-05 07:56)