Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Various (682 Views)
Posted by: TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: February 02, 2005 02:28PM

Bit-- I assume the reference to Ms. Ross went to my earlier proclamation here of undying love (to say nothing of lust), and if anyone wants to see the perfect woman (at least to a guy from ages 18 to about 30), check out the scene with her, Newman, and the bicycle in Butch Cassidy. But the scene between Branagh and Thompson in Hank V is great ("We are the makers of fashion", and "Take me, take a soldier. Take a soldier, take a King"). Goldman is good, but no Willy Shake. And Branagh and Thompson should really get back together, so they can have careers again.

Don't know whether this is true, but I've been told that some of the earlier film version of the play, starring Olivier, was censored (!!!-- this is Shakespeare we're talking about). It came out during or right after WWII, and some of the things Henry says in an earlier speech to get those under siege in a castle to give it up sounded too much like Nazi atrocities-- we'll crush your babies skulls, put them on spits, etc. Which brings us to Richard the "Lion Hearted"-- but that's another story.

Still grinning about LF as Falstaff. And Alydar/JJ has a little Hotspur in him...

SoCal-- Confusing is right, and not a further peep of explanation out of Jake. I have no idea what to make of it, or who actually should get credit for the claim, except I would take with a grain of salt any claims of "sheet connection" in the future. The problem Ragozin had in California (which LF does) back in 03 had to do with having 1 turn races too fast, relative to routes, and that wouldn't hurt them with this one. When I last looked it seemed they had made changes to fix the problem, which LF denied ever having.

CH and Bull-- Friedman and I were very good friends, and went to the track together hundreds of times. He was a very good guy (although a guy who worked for Ragozin for 25 years, since retired, vehemently disagrees with this). When I set up shop in 82, everything changed, and I became the devil. You guys only see what takes place publicly on the two boards, where I can refute allegations, but there was a 15 year stretch before that where some truly unconscionable stuff was directed my way on a daily basis in the field, and as I expressly said when we began this board, one of my aims was to get that stuff out in the open, where I could fight it. It worked-- the down side is that this place at times is a combat zone, but you almost never hear the kind of crap about us now that you saw on a regular basis just a few years ago.

Regarding making up-- a few years ago (I think 99), Len and I met in Union Square Park to discuss some kind of deal between the two companies (think Beckett and Henry II meeting on the plain). The first words out of Len's mouth were that he didn't know if they wanted to do a deal with someone of my "moral character". I calmy (really) asked him to provide me with an example of that character, and he brought up an incident from 1978 when, in Ragozin's office, I charged him a commission for advising on the claim of a horse he had an interest in, rather than giving him a freebie as a friend.

Then, about half an hour later, I informed him that an employee of theirs (Charlie Nebel, one of the ones we later caught on tape) was lying about us, in this case to the producer of the ABC Triple Crown telecasts, saying that we didn't use observers-- that we faked our ground. Len laughed, and said he believed it, Charlie didn't like me. I asked him if he would do something about it, and he said no, he had no interest.

So no, I don't think there will be kissing and making up any time soon.



TGJB



Subject Written By Posted
Various (682 Views) TGJB 02/02/2005 02:28PM
Re: Various (451 Views) Bull 02/03/2005 12:48AM
Re: Various (443 Views) 02/03/2005 12:13PM
Re: Various (423 Views) TGJB 02/03/2005 01:24PM
Re: Various (415 Views) Boscar Obarra 02/03/2005 04:42PM
Re: Various (456 Views) SoCalMan2 02/03/2005 06:36PM
Re: Various (416 Views) TGJB 02/03/2005 07:13PM
Don't make me laugh. (429 Views) Mall 02/03/2005 09:40PM
I am not Ethel Mertz (395 Views) SoCalMan2 02/04/2005 01:23AM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (463 Views) Mall 02/04/2005 02:32AM
Does Belichick use SHEETS (429 Views) Silver Charm 02/04/2005 03:28AM
Re: Does Belichick use SHEETS (586 Views) xichibanx 02/04/2005 09:25AM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (384 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 02/04/2005 04:41PM
a live link, I think. (445 Views) Mall 02/04/2005 07:08PM
Re: a live link, I think. (516 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 02/04/2005 08:28PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (426 Views) SoCalMan2 02/08/2005 03:06AM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (437 Views) TGJB 02/08/2005 01:57PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (432 Views) TGJB 02/04/2005 01:35PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (395 Views) derby1592 02/04/2005 10:44PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (441 Views) sabowen 02/04/2005 11:55PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (431 Views) SoCalMan2 02/08/2005 03:25AM
Interesting Post and (437 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 02/08/2005 12:36PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (440 Views) Mall 02/08/2005 05:46PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (405 Views) TGJB 02/08/2005 05:53PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (431 Views) Michael D. 02/08/2005 06:33PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (462 Views) TGJB 02/08/2005 06:47PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (409 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 02/08/2005 07:50PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (427 Views) Mall 02/08/2005 07:31PM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (476 Views) SoCalMan2 02/09/2005 11:27AM
Re: I am not Ethel Mertz (428 Views) TGJB 02/09/2005 01:07PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.