Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
For Plever Only (875 Views)
Posted by: Alydar in California (IP Logged)
Date: October 29, 2002 06:28AM

Steve: The archives are working again:

Steve Plever on 5-9-2002, in part: "Anyway, here are my points. First, on Alydar: His quotes are correct. But an after-the-fact smile and 'thanks for defending us' from someone in the Rag office is not at all the same as a before-the-fact encouragement. Especially when, as Alydar concedes, those words were followed one of the next times I went to the office to buy Sheets by Jake's wise counsel that responding to the attacks was futile and that I should stop wasting my time. (Call me a dummy all you want but don't lay that label on Jake.)

So Jake is absolutely correct in calling Alydar a baldfaced liar for saying the Rag office encouraged me. Aldyar tried to present the image that I am part of a Rag office-directed conspiracy to create conflict on this board. Bull. I didn't bother seconding Jake's post because there was nothing else to say without breaking a bargain I had made with Alydar.

When I made the mistake of exchanging a few e-mails with Alydar, I mistakenly thought a private context would produce a more interesting, less hostile exchange. I hoped to learn more about him and give him a less jaundiced view of me. To facilitate that, I asked and he agreed that the e-mail contents would remain between us. I guess he has conveniently forgotten about that little promise.

But Before you nail me for posting on this board this once, consider the deal made by Alydar."

Posted by Steve Plever on April 06, 2001 at 14:12:24:

In Reply to: Re: before it's deleted--TGJB--TG posted by TGJB on April 06, 2001 at 07:45:45:

TGJB:

Appreciate your good faith, which seems in regrettably short supply in this arena. The reason I don't go your suggested route is as follows...

You know that the Rag office has never badmouthed you to me. But I thought you'd be interested in the very few occasions that they did talk about your operation with me: I did get some thank-yous for defending them on your site. (Later, I got some friendly advice to the effect that continuing was pretty pointless, and wasn't I wasting too much time on the Internet?)

I also got some chuckles at the Rag office for pestering you into admitting your Gulfstream clocker's inexperienced mistake a few years back.

But they also told me you were being absolutely truthful about the Belmont turf watering story you posted -- they volunteered that you were right and they were wrong without me asking.

So for me to come to them now, and demand to know whether they run around lying about you, would be insulting, unwarranted and wrong.

I am not only skeptical of your claims of rampant dirty tricks, but I also have trouble believing that there are more than a handful of sheet players stupid enough to be influenced by the conduct your lawyer's letter alleges. And without a small stack of affidavits from misled players a court case is indeed out of the question.

Does that excuse the conduct? If it actually took place as you described (which I doubt, given my experience), no. But it does reduce the alleged crime to the level of a stupid sophomoric prank -- like nasty grafitti from one frat dissing another. Which is also what many of the posts on this Web site look like.

So rather than asking either office what they did or didn't do in the past, customers should urge both sides to stop any future ugliness from this point on -- it is an embarressment to the handicapping community.

Before I had ever been to the Rag office, I posted on their site urging them to stop some nasty posts I saw about your product. They did. (I'm sure the timing was a coincidence -- I was a new customer they had never met.)

The juvenile name calling on this site is one thing. But the recent exchanges -- which could trigger fistfights if they were face to face instead of keyboard to keyboard -- are another. They should lead you to reconsider your bb policies and your approach to this whole dispute.

I am glad that at least you and I are having a more respectful exchange than in the past, so this seems like the right moment to ban myself again, this time for good. HP, you say you made your last post on the Rag board -- this'll be my last post here. (I know, JB, you'll believe that when you see it.)

Peace,
SP



Subject Written By Posted
one response and one only (1218 Views) Steve Plever 05/09/2002 07:28PM
Re: one response and one only (854 Views) TGJB 05/09/2002 08:39PM
Re: one response and one only (811 Views) Alydar in California 05/10/2002 12:50AM
Re: one response and one only (841 Views) JR 05/10/2002 07:32PM
Re: one response and one only (859 Views) Alydar in California 05/10/2002 11:16PM
Re: one response and one only (820 Views) TGJB 05/10/2002 11:35PM
Re: one response and one only (826 Views) JR 05/10/2002 11:47PM
Re: one response and one only (882 Views) Alydar in California 05/10/2002 11:52PM
Re: one response and one only (855 Views) JR 05/10/2002 11:57PM
Re: one response and one only (875 Views) Alydar in California 05/11/2002 12:27AM
Re: one response and one only (815 Views) Mall 05/11/2002 12:50AM
Re: one response and one only (831 Views) Alydar in California 05/11/2002 01:07AM
Re: one response and one only (864 Views) Mall 05/12/2002 12:23AM
Re: one response and one only (870 Views) Alydar in California 05/12/2002 08:02AM
Re: one response and one only (887 Views) Mall 05/12/2002 03:26PM
Re: one response and one only (789 Views) JR 05/12/2002 03:26PM
Re: one response and one only (852 Views) TGJB 05/11/2002 04:07PM
Re: one response and one only (847 Views) JR 05/11/2002 05:33PM
Re: one response and one only (875 Views) TGJB 05/11/2002 08:07PM
For Plever Only (875 Views) Alydar in California 10/29/2002 06:28AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.