I'll tell you what Beyer...from now on, I'll only offer commentary on wagers made prefaced by postings of the precise bets. If the post doenst say:

$2 Superfecta 7 - 2,4,5 - 2,4,5-1,2,3,4,5,6 ...I won't mention it ex post facto. That prolly sounds like a decent cash to you but I had the 2 and 4 atop it much now more aggressively.

I'm not gonna mention cashing unless I write like I have written above confirming with you and Jimbo precisely how to bet. To do this I'll have to write my wagers down on a text file and copy and paste them just before offtime. However, if I'm gonna go through the trouble to document the precise nature of my wagers, I'm going to expect the same from you Beyer, because if we are gonna laugh at my wagers and belly rumble, its only logical that we get a look at yours so we can really guffaw. I mean eyes watering hysterically, because I love to laugh. I'm a clown. :)

On the other hand, it may be easier for me to go about my business. I don't need this board and I'm not a big believer in an all important view of mass produced speed figures. If I'm not mistaken a 3.3 horse won the race in question, although I know most of the guys that caught it here, caught it on Pletcher and not the subtleties of what actually got him up. Thats in my favor and its why guys like Beyer and Jimbo are not worth wasting my time.

This may be my last post. But if it is, I'll leave you with one last gem. Contemplate the nature of Bellamy Roads Wood and Gulfstream races.

CtMC



Post Edited (04-16-05 19:28)