Re: Self Indulgent Children (Sic?) (349 Views)
Posted by:
Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: April 24, 2005 05:55PM
This is a topic right up Silver Charms alley, but I'll chime in.
He thinks he's creative. That's got to count for something.
Hegarty's article was as rambling as Indulto's post in my view.
Indulto's reference to Freidman was as odd as Hegarty's quote of the man. Apparently, Freidman's position is that the detention barn is no sanction and that additional positives are no more likely to be detected by a trainer under detention. All things considered thats an interesting position.
I guess Indulto's main point was that you were jealous of the fine press Freidman received. Seems to me they both could have used their 15 seconds more wisely.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.