Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024  • 2 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: NEGATIVE NUMBERS-JERRY (530 Views)
Posted by: Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: May 08, 2005 04:08PM

mbeychok wrote:

> Look it is way too early to make any conclusions be they broad
> or specific about what detention barns and better testing will
> do or are doing. The facts are that Frankel's horses in Ky.
> have NOT run to their figures on a whole. Multiple losing
> favorites at both KEE and CD over the past week. Did he win
> some races? Sure, but I would guess no new tops.

They guys who were onto the new testing have postulated a theory that on its face cannot yet be disproven by track results. I still don't know precisely where or when the testing changed, so I can't investigate the theory fully. What seems even more important now is where the same or more stingent testing will be applied.

> Pletcher
> isn't going to just suddenly stop winning races. C'mon! He's
> got better stock than Lukas/Baffert in their heyday. He'll win
> races because he's a good trainer (okay that's debatable)and he
> has superior stock.

Bandini was only a 500K purchase. Coin Silver 65K. Pletcher has undoubtedly been juicing and if they are able to dry him up who is to say where he will rate. Has he been relying upon horsemenship or the juice?

Romans had an un-Romans like Kee and CD as
> well. Now, I'm not pointing fingers but in the last week Dutrow
> had an un-Dutrow like 1-fer-10 at Belmont. What this does for
> those of us that use Thorograph figures and bet on these
> trainers is put us in a real dillema. I also use trainer
> patterns without figures (I know this is blaspehmous) but it
> works for me. I don't ask how a trainer gets a figure off a
> layoff or claim I just bet it. But, using figures that were
> earned by supertrainers' horses in the past is going to a
> difficult proposition going forward. How to subjectively
> evaluate a past figure with a general knowledge that the horse
> won't be on juice is..well, making this game much more
> difficult. It's still a wait and see what happens mode but I'm
> certainly taking closer looks at races where juice trainers'
> horses are going off big favs based on past figures if those
> juicers are cold.

There was more to juice horses running without juice in the Derby (assuming they ran without it) Bandini and High Limit did not crash and burn on the juice issue. Frankel supposedly had High Limits foot looked at, but he's also supposedly headed to Pimlico, so the foot issue could be cover for inability to apply the mojo and lo and behold form reversal in the Preakness. I'm just skeptical of juice being that decisive a factor. Its an advantage, not a panacea.



Subject Written By Posted
NEGATIVE NUMBERS-JERRY (907 Views) high roller 05/08/2005 01:17PM
Re: NEGATIVE NUMBERS-JERRY (423 Views) bloodline bob 05/08/2005 01:38PM
Re: NEGATIVE NUMBERS-JERRY (405 Views) TGJB 05/08/2005 01:48PM
Re: NEGATIVE NUMBERS-JERRY (406 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 05/08/2005 02:04PM
Re: NEGATIVE NUMBERS-JERRY (410 Views) mbeychok 05/08/2005 03:16PM
Re: NEGATIVE NUMBERS-JERRY (530 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 05/08/2005 04:08PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.