Re: JB - Do the results cause a revisit of previous figures? (355 Views)
Posted by:
Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: May 10, 2005 04:20PM
jimbo66 wrote:
> As for JB ignoring CH's posts, I am offering 8 to 5 to all
> takers, that JB can't control himself for 2 weeks. Something
> will be posted that will drive him to respond :)
The over/under line is 2 weeks?...May 24th?
I'll take the under.
Mike Brown, that was a fast Bluegrass. If Bandini gets back 100% hes gonna show it. Don't you think its a little unfair to state anyone would compare different days in assigning numbers? Thats just not worthy of debate. Anyone thats ever attempted to make their own numbers knows thats nonsense. They also know how hard it can be to assign a figure on a one or maybe 2 race sample for the day. Nothing in horseracing is an exact science. Thats the intrigue of it. Not everyone can figure it out. But here they labor to get ground and weight and wind accurately incorporated into the number. You're gonna have the occasional tough race. This year the tough races have come consecutively and thats tough for EVERYONE>
That was a mistatement...not weight...weight is adjusted for the next one
Post Edited (05-10-05 16:53)
