Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (421 Views)
Posted by: Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: September 19, 2005 10:57PM

Depending upon what number comes back you'll be in the Bellamania dilema. If the number comes back fast and you want to bet this horse at about 7-5 you'll be able to say he got about 6 weeks to recover and with the additional time he can Pair so I'll bet him.

If you think the number is fast but his history is a little ouchy and a bounce is likely or you think the Atto number factored too fast, you'll be able to take a stand against him. Obviously a tougher post would make the latter more attractive.

Buyer gave Leroid a 114, a career top. It will be interesting to see what he gave the Canadian Bell Horses. If its fast enough this years Derby lesson shouldnt be too far removed from everyones mind. There is more recovery time however.

Frankel has been managing this horse. He was contemplated for the Shadwell and Kelso Miles. The Atto just came up a little light and Frankel saw it. He knew that field had some questions. He's a cheater but a good handicapper too. More than anything what Leroid has going for him is a weak group of U.S. Milers.



kev Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As far as horses running in the BC races, looks
> like Nothing to lose had a neg. 1.1 at
> 8.0f.......these horses ran neg's but most were
> neg. 0.2 and neg. 0.1's....POWERSCOURT
> 10.0f.....SOARING FREE 8.0F.....WITH ANTICIPATION
> 12.F.....SWEET RETURN distance ? You'll see some
> of these horses running this big number maybe once
> and never come close to it again, but there were
> some that was running 1.2 almost ever time they
> stepped onto the turf.






Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/19/2005 11:04PM by Chuckles_the_Clown2.



Subject Written By Posted
Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (824 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 09/19/2005 03:42PM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (458 Views) kev 09/19/2005 05:54PM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (416 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 09/19/2005 06:03PM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (453 Views) Michael D. 09/19/2005 07:13PM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (448 Views) beyerguy 09/19/2005 07:18PM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (400 Views) Michael D. 09/19/2005 07:39PM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (417 Views) kev 09/19/2005 09:42PM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (385 Views) kev 09/19/2005 10:09PM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (418 Views) kev 09/19/2005 10:37PM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (391 Views) kev 09/20/2005 08:26AM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (421 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 09/19/2005 10:57PM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (437 Views) 09/20/2005 10:46AM
Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (447 Views) 09/20/2005 10:34AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.