Re: Mobil Ground Loss WRONG bad math (421 Views)
Posted by:
Chuckles_the_Clown2 (IP Logged)
Date: September 19, 2005 10:57PM
Depending upon what number comes back you'll be in the Bellamania dilema. If the number comes back fast and you want to bet this horse at about 7-5 you'll be able to say he got about 6 weeks to recover and with the additional time he can Pair so I'll bet him.
If you think the number is fast but his history is a little ouchy and a bounce is likely or you think the Atto number factored too fast, you'll be able to take a stand against him. Obviously a tougher post would make the latter more attractive.
Buyer gave Leroid a 114, a career top. It will be interesting to see what he gave the Canadian Bell Horses. If its fast enough this years Derby lesson shouldnt be too far removed from everyones mind. There is more recovery time however.
Frankel has been managing this horse. He was contemplated for the Shadwell and Kelso Miles. The Atto just came up a little light and Frankel saw it. He knew that field had some questions. He's a cheater but a good handicapper too. More than anything what Leroid has going for him is a weak group of U.S. Milers.
kev Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> As far as horses running in the BC races, looks
> like Nothing to lose had a neg. 1.1 at
> 8.0f.......these horses ran neg's but most were
> neg. 0.2 and neg. 0.1's....POWERSCOURT
> 10.0f.....SOARING FREE 8.0F.....WITH ANTICIPATION
> 12.F.....SWEET RETURN distance ? You'll see some
> of these horses running this big number maybe once
> and never come close to it again, but there were
> some that was running 1.2 almost ever time they
> stepped onto the turf.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 09/19/2005 11:04PM by Chuckles_the_Clown2.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.