By now, it must be painfully clear to all who are following this issue that many sheet players who compare Rags and TG are wondering "Who is getting it wrong?" Aside from some of the parochial comments by the blind followers in both camps, this issue is far from resolved.

It is apparent to me that there is much more going on here than a rather sudden difference of opinion in methodology between former colleagues.Until fairly recent times, a scale of comparison of 3-4 points existed between the two products.In examining both products for about 6 months, that scale of comparison has all but disappeared.Why? Jerry has offered his opinion which goes to various methodoloy differences/errors which he believes are being made by Rags. In the absence of a reply from the RAGS people, there is no way to know what happened.

As a TG customer,I have asked about and debated with Jerry on more than one occasion about certain figures, his theories and opinions.While I still have some issues, I did receive a reply. On the other hand,I am told that several RAGS customers have asked for the 2005 BC figs which were always posted in years past.Call me naive, but with credibility at stake,I would think that Rags would be anxious to challenge Jerry's methodology/figs, NO?

At the very least, why can't RAGS just respond in some fashion so that everyone could form their own opinion of what has/is happening with the figs.

Mike



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/07/2005 11:42AM by miff.