The race was an 8.5f Ill-bred stakes which included 3 horses which had approx the same last sprint no, a 9. Two had what I think most sheet players would consider solid lines, but were short odds. The 3rd, Rolling Sea, had run an 18-26-9 & was coming out of a mcl win, but was 28-1. I expected this horse to have been overlooked as a likely "bounce" candidate when I looked this morning, & was surprised to see that the analyst based his play on the possibilty that RS could pair the 9 in his 1st route. The question is why.