Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: ROTW (622 Views)
Posted by: TGAB (IP Logged)
Date: March 01, 2006 02:16PM

JB was right. It was a rough estimate. Toss the first three efforts, two on dirt, and first on turf. You then have four grass races to deal with. Now forgiving the layoff effort, you have three to look at and Overnightsensation ran a 5 in one of those three.

I said 30% primarily because she did run that competitive figure once and as I've said in the past the most likely indication that a horse will run a competitive figure is the fact that it's done it before. So she gets credit for that effort. But as I said in the Rotw her overall pattern was suspect. But she was lightly raced. So I dampened the prospect slightly to 30%. It's easy to say now that that was a rose-glassed projection, but it was an estimate.

A 5 from the 2-hole getting weight had to give her some shot. Moscow Burning had the only close turf figures in the recent past and was a deserving favorite as I stated. But with conditions, I thought she was vulnerable. Others were either slower, or were dirt horses with some back turf figures, making the reads more dubious. So I came up with again a 3 in 10 chance that the 5 would be good.

Multiply the chances of running the figure, .3, by its winning chances, .3, and you come up with .09, which converts to about 11-1--1/.09.

These were rough estimates borne by experience. It's a useful exercise to get a sense what's fair value and, hence, underlays and overlays. It's a step in generating your own odds line. But frankly, it takes some experience, to make accurate lines.







Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 03/01/2006 03:22PM by TGAB.



Subject Written By Posted
ROTW (1095 Views) davidrex 02/25/2006 11:54AM
Re: ROTW (606 Views) SoCalMan2 02/25/2006 01:18PM
Re: ROTW (599 Views) davidrex 02/25/2006 02:18PM
Re: ROTW (648 Views) flushedstraight 02/25/2006 02:38PM
Re: ROTW (588 Views) davidrex 02/25/2006 08:11PM
Re: ROTW (569 Views) msola1 02/26/2006 10:01AM
Re: ROTW (685 Views) TGJB 02/26/2006 01:35PM
Re: ROTW (586 Views) Silver Charm 02/26/2006 02:07PM
Re: ROTW (585 Views) muskratthecat 02/26/2006 03:04PM
Re: ROTW (537 Views) msola1 03/01/2006 07:08AM
Re: ROTW (622 Views) TGAB 03/01/2006 02:16PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.