Jason: Since you ignored JB's reply, I'm doing it this way: These are statements you have made over the past two days. One didn't necessarily follow another. Look them up:

Jason wrote: "...TG users do not believe in averages in relation to figure making..."

I did not write that. Document your statement, Jason. If you have something to say, say it. If you have someone in mind, name him. If you can prove something with a quote, prove it. If none of the above, keep doing what you have been doing, but expect to be challenged, and expect it to be a persistent challenge.

Jason wrote: : "...nobody ever contended that JB 'forces his numbers into tight patterns'."

Explain this statement, Jason. It's from a Raggie: "...[JB] manipulates the variant to achieve a tighter range of results."

Jason wrote: "The criticism is that everytime JB senses an 'anomoly' he..."

Ask your secretary to fix the errors here. They are beginning to get on my nerves. OVER AND OVER you do this, Jason. It is at least six times now on one of them. I'm beginning to think that...forget it. By the way, do you work in Encino? You ducked my earlier question on this.

Jason wrote: "JB's assertions that Ragozin must be guilty of slander ..."

This sounds serious, Jason. Surely you can tell us where we can find this statement of JB's. You had better.

Jason wrote: "No lawyer would ever advise a client to answer such allegations, as it could only be used against him in the future."

This is ludicrous on its face. I know you don't believe it. Why did you write it, Jason? Don't you know a lawyer who could tell you how "stupid" (to use a word you have been using) this statement is?

Jason wrote: "My point in this is not to accuse JB of anything."

You would NOT say that under oath, would you?

Jason wrote: "Is it immoral? Well, that is for each individual to decide."

Indeed. I will be back on Sunday night. I would very much like to talk to you about the morality of what you have been doing here.