Re: Good for the NYRA!! (724 Views)
Posted by:
miff (IP Logged)
Date: June 13, 2006 06:21PM
JB,
Not to waste your time but any betting software is not TOO FAR from the amateur bettors(yet computer geeks)that past posted the pick six just two years ago.
Can you imagine if the amateur bettors were sophisticated gamblers who made a "real" looking or multiple pick six ticket.They could have spot played and maybe never been caught.
My point is that if guys like E.D. need that type of accomodation and there are external checks and balances, then OK,otherwise no.
Mike
Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (1325 Views)
|
Delmar Deb |
06/11/2006 03:02AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (868 Views)
|
imallin |
06/11/2006 04:00AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (847 Views)
|
richiebee |
06/11/2006 08:21AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (682 Views)
|
imallin |
06/11/2006 10:34AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (709 Views)
|
imallin |
06/11/2006 10:37AM |
Good for the NYRA!! (2201 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/12/2006 11:14AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (739 Views)
|
imallin |
06/12/2006 03:11PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (792 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/12/2006 09:57PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (667 Views)
|
miff |
06/13/2006 08:41AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (599 Views)
|
miff |
06/20/2006 05:15PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (720 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/21/2006 01:19PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (691 Views)
|
marcus |
06/13/2006 09:16AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (725 Views)
|
imallin |
06/13/2006 11:18AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (651 Views)
|
marcus |
06/13/2006 12:21PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (677 Views)
|
jmetro |
06/13/2006 12:34PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (749 Views)
|
imallin |
06/13/2006 03:36PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (804 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/13/2006 04:21PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (614 Views)
|
miff |
06/13/2006 05:11PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (870 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/13/2006 05:46PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (704 Views)
|
miff |
06/13/2006 06:00PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (830 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/13/2006 06:10PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (724 Views) |
miff |
06/13/2006 06:21PM |
It's not a market; it's a zero-sum game (663 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/13/2006 06:58PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (842 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/14/2006 01:21AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (738 Views)
|
imallin |
06/13/2006 06:47PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (739 Views)
|
miff |
06/13/2006 07:10PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (736 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/16/2006 12:27AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (634 Views)
|
miff |
06/16/2006 09:59AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (752 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/16/2006 02:08PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (613 Views)
|
Wrongly |
06/16/2006 03:22PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (718 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/16/2006 03:32PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (711 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/16/2006 06:01PM |
Effect of Large Rebate Players on Pools (743 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/18/2006 07:54PM |
Re: Effect of Large Rebate Players on Pools (727 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/18/2006 08:36PM |
Re: Effect of Large Rebate Players on Pools (678 Views)
|
imallin |
06/19/2006 10:40AM |
Rebates v. Batch Wagering (643 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/19/2006 01:29PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (702 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/19/2006 01:48PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (661 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/19/2006 02:46PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (670 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/19/2006 03:55PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (675 Views)
|
miff |
06/19/2006 04:43PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (752 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/19/2006 06:42PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (593 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/20/2006 01:50AM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (728 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/20/2006 11:04AM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (650 Views)
|
P-Dub |
06/22/2006 03:42AM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (675 Views)
|
imallin |
06/19/2006 02:49PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (699 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/19/2006 06:30PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (651 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/21/2006 12:32AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (645 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/21/2006 12:56PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (621 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/21/2006 11:43PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (570 Views)
|
imallin |
06/22/2006 07:55AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (598 Views)
|
jmetro |
06/22/2006 09:36AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (540 Views)
|
imallin |
06/22/2006 10:07AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (666 Views)
|
P.Eckhart |
06/22/2006 10:18AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (583 Views)
|
1st time lasix |
06/22/2006 10:54AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (619 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/22/2006 11:15PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (592 Views)
|
miff |
06/23/2006 10:34AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (775 Views)
|
flushedstraight |
06/23/2006 12:47PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (579 Views)
|
Wrongly |
06/23/2006 01:19PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (627 Views)
|
rangers94 |
06/23/2006 01:36PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (623 Views)
|
imallin |
06/23/2006 07:08PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (588 Views)
|
1st time lasix |
06/26/2006 09:48AM |
Re: Effect of Large Rebate Players on Pools (752 Views)
|
marcus |
06/19/2006 06:17PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (699 Views)
|
marcus |
06/13/2006 07:22PM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (831 Views)
|
Thehoarsehorseplayer |
06/11/2006 10:28AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (929 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/11/2006 01:36PM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (716 Views)
|
miff |
06/11/2006 10:41AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (832 Views)
|
Delmar Deb |
06/11/2006 11:10AM |