Re: Good for the NYRA!! (738 Views)
Posted by:
imallin (IP Logged)
Date: June 13, 2006 06:47PM
Mike,
all players Do have it. You just have to bet 10 million (or more), be signed up with a place that permits it and have the intelligence to construct the software and implement it and all that good stuff.
It SEEMS like we all don't have access, but we do. Its not the fault of the whales that you don't have the financial power to bet 10-20 mil or more a year.
What it comes down to is this. We SAY "if all players don't have access, no one should" but we MEAN, "because i'm not financially able to get access myself, i want to condemn the bigger bankrolled players way of doing things"
Now, what WOULDNT be fair is if you DID have the ability to wager millions upon millions per year and were with a certain company and they told you, "no, this is only for a certain few"
Believe me, if you find a place and were betting millions (and making that place a fortune) the first thing they want to do is put you in a position to be able to bet as much as you possibly can.
Who's to say that that particular way is NOT the best way to do things? Because most horseplayers don't have the intelligence, bankroll or desire to bet in this fashion, doesn't mean that we should condemn those taking an edge where they can get it.
More power to em.
I WANT these guys in the pools...they aren't handicappers, they are 'dutchers'. They spread money on tons of different combos....its not like they are hammering one or 2 numbers...they are betting hundreds and sometimes thousands of combos...thats good for me and you the way i see it because only one combo can win. If you get the winner, their losses on the other combos help boost your price.
Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (1326 Views)
|
Delmar Deb |
06/11/2006 03:02AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (868 Views)
|
imallin |
06/11/2006 04:00AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (847 Views)
|
richiebee |
06/11/2006 08:21AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (682 Views)
|
imallin |
06/11/2006 10:34AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (709 Views)
|
imallin |
06/11/2006 10:37AM |
Good for the NYRA!! (2201 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/12/2006 11:14AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (740 Views)
|
imallin |
06/12/2006 03:11PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (793 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/12/2006 09:57PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (667 Views)
|
miff |
06/13/2006 08:41AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (599 Views)
|
miff |
06/20/2006 05:15PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (720 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/21/2006 01:19PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (692 Views)
|
marcus |
06/13/2006 09:16AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (726 Views)
|
imallin |
06/13/2006 11:18AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (651 Views)
|
marcus |
06/13/2006 12:21PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (678 Views)
|
jmetro |
06/13/2006 12:34PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (750 Views)
|
imallin |
06/13/2006 03:36PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (804 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/13/2006 04:21PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (614 Views)
|
miff |
06/13/2006 05:11PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (870 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/13/2006 05:46PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (704 Views)
|
miff |
06/13/2006 06:00PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (830 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/13/2006 06:10PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (725 Views)
|
miff |
06/13/2006 06:21PM |
It's not a market; it's a zero-sum game (664 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/13/2006 06:58PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (842 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/14/2006 01:21AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (738 Views) |
imallin |
06/13/2006 06:47PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (740 Views)
|
miff |
06/13/2006 07:10PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (736 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/16/2006 12:27AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (635 Views)
|
miff |
06/16/2006 09:59AM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (753 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/16/2006 02:08PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (613 Views)
|
Wrongly |
06/16/2006 03:22PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (719 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/16/2006 03:32PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (712 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/16/2006 06:01PM |
Effect of Large Rebate Players on Pools (743 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/18/2006 07:54PM |
Re: Effect of Large Rebate Players on Pools (728 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/18/2006 08:36PM |
Re: Effect of Large Rebate Players on Pools (679 Views)
|
imallin |
06/19/2006 10:40AM |
Rebates v. Batch Wagering (643 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/19/2006 01:29PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (702 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/19/2006 01:48PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (662 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/19/2006 02:46PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (670 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/19/2006 03:55PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (675 Views)
|
miff |
06/19/2006 04:43PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (752 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/19/2006 06:42PM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (593 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/20/2006 01:50AM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (728 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/20/2006 11:04AM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (651 Views)
|
P-Dub |
06/22/2006 03:42AM |
Re: Rebates v. Batch Wagering (676 Views)
|
imallin |
06/19/2006 02:49PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (699 Views)
|
BitPlayer |
06/19/2006 06:30PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (651 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/21/2006 12:32AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (646 Views)
|
asfufh |
06/21/2006 12:56PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (621 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/21/2006 11:43PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (570 Views)
|
imallin |
06/22/2006 07:55AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (599 Views)
|
jmetro |
06/22/2006 09:36AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (541 Views)
|
imallin |
06/22/2006 10:07AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (666 Views)
|
P.Eckhart |
06/22/2006 10:18AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (584 Views)
|
1st time lasix |
06/22/2006 10:54AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (619 Views)
|
Boscar Obarra |
06/22/2006 11:15PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (592 Views)
|
miff |
06/23/2006 10:34AM |
Re: Batch Wagering (776 Views)
|
flushedstraight |
06/23/2006 12:47PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (580 Views)
|
Wrongly |
06/23/2006 01:19PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (627 Views)
|
rangers94 |
06/23/2006 01:36PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (623 Views)
|
imallin |
06/23/2006 07:08PM |
Re: Batch Wagering (589 Views)
|
1st time lasix |
06/26/2006 09:48AM |
Re: Effect of Large Rebate Players on Pools (753 Views)
|
marcus |
06/19/2006 06:17PM |
Re: Good for the NYRA!! (700 Views)
|
marcus |
06/13/2006 07:22PM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (831 Views)
|
Thehoarsehorseplayer |
06/11/2006 10:28AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (930 Views)
|
TGJB |
06/11/2006 01:36PM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (716 Views)
|
miff |
06/11/2006 10:41AM |
Re: Jockey Change - Belmont, 6/10, 12th race (833 Views)
|
Delmar Deb |
06/11/2006 11:10AM |