Clown, when you showed your lack of knowledge about synthetic surfaces by saying the that it was only used for summer racing in England, when in fact it was designed for and has been used with great success as an all-weather track in English winter racing, it looked like you were going to wisely lay low. Now you’re back with more twisted arguments that try to prove the very opposite of what is true. If there is any similarity between people with views on the Iraq war and those with views on Polytrack it its exactly opposite to what you claim. I see a better parallel between those that care nothing about the deaths and injuries in the current war but cling to the traditional conservative philosophy of staying the course as usual, in the face of all the studies and reports that say we badly need to change our policies there, and those that are indifferent to all the lives saved by Polytrack because they prefer to cling to their old conservative loyalty to the outdated dirt tracks in the face of all the studies that show the synthetic surfaces are safer. Your insensitivity regarding individual horses like Lost in the Fog and Barbaro has just been out-done with your lack of concern for all the horses that could be saved with the replacement over old dirt tracks with Poly. Worse of all to try to link those that want to improve conditions for both horses and riders with the bushoviks fascists when it is the opposers of the new surface that better fit that description. This shows you to be seriously confused as well as uncaring. Get a clue, and try some psychiatric help while you’re at it.

Bob