Re: Negative numbers as a young 3 year old (970 Views)
Posted by:
Silver Charm (IP Logged)
Date: April 23, 2007 01:01PM
Is this because contrary to what I just said about there probably not being any three year olds in the Study who laid off eight weeks after the Negative.
He actually did in the transition from two years old to three years old.
Which raises another question,
"How many of those in the Study ran their Negative in November as two year olds?"