Re: Chilukki: Hard Cases Make Bad Law (804 Views)
Posted by:
Alydar in California (IP Logged)
Date: February 06, 2003 03:04PM
JB,
Your first part is a wonderful answer to a question I didn't ask.
Also:
"The sentence about my understanding how Ragozin makes figures better than Friedman does was edited, but I think I got my point across."
Yes, but that wasn't really my point, was it?
"Speaking of which, you neglected to ask me the most obvious question raised by the post you are responding to."
Do you expect me to interfere with you when you announce that you are setting a trap for Friedman? Besides, I am saving some of the good stuff for later.