>If truly necessary I will address this when I have some free time,

Great, thanks.

>Who's the one with the bias?

I didn't think this discussion was about me.

>And if you want to play that game, are are you just an objective observer, or are you friends with any of the principals in this show?

Ok, I guess you've changed this discussion, hopefully quite briefly, to being about me. I'm not friends with anyone who works for Ragozin. I'm not friends with anyone who works for Tgraph. I'm friends with the writer of the 124 (or at least 3) questions. I do not benefit financially in any way if this writer succeeds in raising a variety of interesting questions about Tgraph/you, nor do I have any idea whether I'll even care about most of the questions he raises.

Ethically, I think, that's a better place to be than pretending like one is merely an observer when in fact one is being paid by Tgraph for other services rendered. If the writer of the 124 was in some way compensating me financially, that would be a different story. But he's not. In fact, we haven't ever even discussed these questions. I'm merely responding to what I see.

Looking forward to you addressing the questions I've raised. It's pretty creepy if/when anyone paid by Ragozin posts anonymously pretending to be something other than someone paid by Ragozin. If you want to make the argument that you are somehow more trustworthy or believable, I'm hopeful you'll get any further Mandown-style revelations out of the way immediately.