Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Addendum (631 Views)
Posted by: dpatent (IP Logged)
Date: June 12, 2003 02:37PM

Mandown:

I am sorry that I frustrate you, but I think that I have been pretty clear on where I stand with regard to the issues and anybody who wants can read the posts and make their own judgments.

A couple of small clean-up points:

1) I did not criticize or critique Jerry's Preakness analysis. I criticized the boosters who posted on the Ragozin site and just happened to overlook the fact that anyone who bet the race based on the analysis would have lost everything. I don't fault Jerry at all for changing his bet in real life. The risk Jerry takes when he posts an analysis coupled with a specific betting strategy is that he can look pretty bad if the posted strategy fails but then he makes money and draws attention to that. You acknowledged as much. Friedman has the benefit of posting an analysis coupled with a morass of wishy-washy nonsense about using lightly, sprinkling, use a tad, a dash, a heavy dose, etc. that is useless for anyone looking for specific betting guidance. And, by the way, I have criticized Friedman for this and parodied it last year on both sites -- that is right -- both sites.

By the way, Jerry's Belmont analysis should have produced a decent profit to anybody who rationed out their betting units reasonably, so good for him.

2) I do think that I apologized for some over-exuberance in celebrating my obviously pyrrhic victory at the windows last year. If not, then, I apologize.

Finally, a series of related questions, Mandown that I am sure you will answer.

As you know, I post under my real name on both sites. Since I have a propensity to lose passwords, sometimes my name shows up a bit differently, but everybody knows exactly who I am.

Obviously, your real name is not Mandown, but I wonder, do you post under any assumed names either on this board or the Ragozin board? Since you feel it is important to be above-board and consistent on both boards, do you agree that would be important for you to disclose it if in fact you post under a different name on the Ragozin board? Particularly if you were to make posts on that board attacking Ragozin? Especially given your affiliation with Brown? Just curious.

By the way, I know the answer to all of those questions, but wanted to give you a chance to out yourself yet again.



Subject Written By Posted
Re: Repost-- first 3 of 124 questions (1230 Views) TGJB 06/09/2003 06:01PM
Re: Repost-- first 3 of 124 questions (662 Views) HP 06/10/2003 08:48AM
Re: Repost-- first 3 of 124 questions (718 Views) Marc At 06/10/2003 10:50AM
Addendum (794 Views) Marc At 06/10/2003 11:00AM
Re: Addendum (704 Views) TGJB 06/10/2003 12:19PM
Re: Addendum (683 Views) TGJB 06/10/2003 06:03PM
Re: Addendum (708 Views) Marc At 06/11/2003 10:44AM
Re: Addendum (635 Views) HP 06/11/2003 11:51AM
Re: Addendum (587 Views) mandown 06/11/2003 02:39PM
Re: Addendum (545 Views) TGJB 06/11/2003 02:55PM
Re: Addendum (633 Views) dpatent 06/11/2003 05:22PM
Re: Addendum (657 Views) TGJB 06/11/2003 06:09PM
Re: Addendum (743 Views) dpatent 06/11/2003 06:33PM
Re: Addendum (722 Views) TGJB 06/11/2003 06:51PM
Re: Addendum (674 Views) mandown 06/11/2003 06:46PM
Re: Addendum (655 Views) dpatent 06/11/2003 08:13PM
Re: Addendum (629 Views) mandown 06/12/2003 03:37AM
Re: Addendum (633 Views) HP 06/12/2003 08:56AM
Why Don't Sharks Eat Overboard Lawyers? (650 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 06/12/2003 11:11AM
Re: Addendum (740 Views) TGJB 06/12/2003 02:14PM
Re: Addendum (621 Views) dpatent 06/12/2003 02:46PM
Re: Addendum (674 Views) TGJB 06/12/2003 02:53PM
Re: Addendum: DPatent (774 Views) bdhsheets 06/12/2003 06:21PM
Re: Addendum (631 Views) dpatent 06/12/2003 02:37PM
Re: Addendum (642 Views) mandown 06/12/2003 03:09PM
Re: Addendum (607 Views) tonyk 06/12/2003 03:44PM
Re: Repost-- first 3 of 124 questions (629 Views) HP 06/10/2003 11:47AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.