Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Jim re: Ty Cobb (555 Views)
Posted by: JimP (IP Logged)
Date: January 12, 2004 06:18PM

Sure Pete Rose belongs in the HOF based on his career as a player. Just as much as Ty Cobb belongs. BUT Pete Rose disqualified himself by breaking the cardinal rule of baseball. He bet on a baseball game while an active participant. And he did it as both a player and as a manager. So far, he has only admitted to the latter. And he did it illegally. He MAY have only bet on his own team. But then again maybe that's only the part to which has admitted so far. Maybe we'll eventually learn that he bet against his team as well. But whether he did or he didn't is ultimately not relevant. He broke the cardinal rule of baseball. He'e out of baseball and the HOF as a result. MLB should keep it that way.



Subject Written By Posted
No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (1015 Views) TGJB 01/07/2004 01:46PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (740 Views) HP 01/07/2004 01:55PM
Ty Cobb (659 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 01/11/2004 05:31AM
Re: Ty Cobb (645 Views) JimP 01/11/2004 09:13AM
Jim re: Ty Cobb (641 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 01/11/2004 03:34PM
Re: Jim re: Ty Cobb (706 Views) JimP 01/11/2004 08:22PM
Re: Jim re: Ty Cobb (741 Views) HP 01/12/2004 11:12AM
Re: Jim re: Ty Cobb (703 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 01/12/2004 01:22PM
Re: Jim re: Ty Cobb (597 Views) HP 01/12/2004 01:45PM
Re: Jim re: Ty Cobb (555 Views) JimP 01/12/2004 06:18PM
Re: Jim re: Ty Cobb (691 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 01/13/2004 01:21AM
Re: Jim re: Ty Cobb (729 Views) JimP 01/13/2004 10:29AM
Re: Jim re: Ty Cobb (692 Views) bdhsheets 01/13/2004 03:24AM
John Dowd and Rose (726 Views) bdhsheets 01/13/2004 03:30AM
Re: John Dowd and Rose (620 Views) HP 01/13/2004 08:42AM
Charlie Hustle (597 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 01/13/2004 04:16PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (635 Views) jbelfior 01/07/2004 03:15PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (759 Views) Mall 01/07/2004 08:17PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (737 Views) hooper 01/07/2004 08:59PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (696 Views) Mall 01/07/2004 10:00PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (716 Views) jbelfior 01/08/2004 08:53AM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (689 Views) Silver Charm 01/08/2004 02:18PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (577 Views) HP 01/08/2004 02:34PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (699 Views) TGJB 01/08/2004 03:02PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (657 Views) Silver Charm 01/08/2004 03:03PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (572 Views) Mall 01/08/2004 06:29PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (646 Views) Silver Charm 01/08/2004 06:49PM
Re: No Such Thing As Bad Publicity? (574 Views) Mall 01/09/2004 09:44AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.