Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 2 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Canterbury (506 Views)
Posted by: banditbeau (IP Logged)
Date: September 15, 2015 10:39PM

Fairmount1 - Odd that you should bring up Canterbury as I wrote a long note to their CEO earlier this week since they are a publicly traded company. (CPHC - trading at $10.29 today. Believe they went public for something like $3/share but guessing at that. I am not a shareholder, but live in MN). The jest of the note was urging them, based exactly on the numbers you present, to take a risk on reworking how the game is managed today in the US. MJ noted their casino deal, most likely the sweetest possible casino deal you will ever find - at least for a few more years, giving them an unprecedented opportunity.

http://www.drf.com/news/canterbury-park-casino-agreement-give-meet-big-boost

They left the harness track completely out of this deal at the 11th hour by the way, so it seems others will be standing in line when/if the next deal is negotiated, which makes the current window more enticing.

I pointed out to him that the current numbers sustain the current purse levels or very close. So, what better time to be he maverick track, and as Boscar pointed out along with others on the board, (the casino's figured it out at 8% rake),lower the takeout to unprecedented levels that you know all of your competition CANNOT match. My suggestion was 8% takeout on pick 3,4,5's, and 10% on every other bet. You have 10 million a year to cover yourself if it does not work for the next 7 years, but it is the only way as Miff or someone mentioned to attract big enough bettors to make the pools viable. HANA rates them 29/62, and gives their simulcast signal an "F" I noted. They drew a season high attendance of 20,000 on July 3 for night racing/fireworks, but the per person average wagered was only about $48. Dollar hotdogs and beers, and camel races won't carry them into the future if their casino deal dries when this is what that crowd wagers. No doubt they have a young crowd, but they need bettors. Lower the take out and it seems likely a double in daily handle is well within reach, and now you also have Midwest competition from Arlington and Prairie Meadows over a barrel big time, and since they race at night during the week, could easily become the premier night track in the country. It would have to carry over some to the daytime weekend cards. Anything higher than double their current handle and they are really moving not only themselves forward, but show every other track in the country the type of model that has at least a chance to move racing back onto the radar screen for the betting public.

I have sent many such notes to NYRA, and their execs, without ever as much as an acknowledgement they got it, and I have not heard from Canterbury either, so it was probably a time waster. But like NYRA's use of their current windfall for seemingly unwarranted purse levels, particularly at Aqu in the winter, Cby seems poised to stand status quo with current industry formats despite all the danger ahead signs visible and squander their unbelievable opportunity as well.

BB



Subject Written By Posted
Racing Don't Need This! (1370 Views) miff 09/10/2015 08:29AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (787 Views) johnnym 09/10/2015 09:55AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (703 Views) miff 09/10/2015 10:09AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (780 Views) Topcat 09/10/2015 10:20AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (605 Views) metroj 09/10/2015 11:51AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (710 Views) Topcat 09/10/2015 12:00PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (635 Views) jerry 09/10/2015 12:51PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (696 Views) rezlegal 09/10/2015 08:10PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (674 Views) jbelfior 09/10/2015 09:15PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (710 Views) Fairmount1 09/10/2015 10:04PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (599 Views) BitPlayer 09/10/2015 11:28PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (633 Views) Topcat 09/11/2015 10:11AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (660 Views) ringato3 09/11/2015 10:53AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (839 Views) TGJB 09/11/2015 10:55AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (626 Views) HP 09/11/2015 11:51AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (570 Views) moosepalm 09/11/2015 09:53PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (554 Views) Holybull1 09/12/2015 04:09AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (534 Views) pizzalove 09/12/2015 08:37AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (462 Views) Topcat 09/12/2015 08:43AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (562 Views) P-Dub 09/11/2015 05:50AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (570 Views) miff 09/11/2015 09:57AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (507 Views) P-Dub 09/11/2015 12:30PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (581 Views) richiebee 09/11/2015 01:16PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (553 Views) jerry 09/12/2015 01:53AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (513 Views) richiebee 09/12/2015 09:26AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (669 Views) Topcat 09/12/2015 10:55AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (565 Views) miff 09/12/2015 11:26AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (512 Views) bellsbendboy 09/12/2015 11:43AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (574 Views) jerry 09/13/2015 12:51PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (562 Views) richiebee 09/13/2015 08:44PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (651 Views) TGJB 09/13/2015 10:05PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (522 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 05:56AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (606 Views) jerry 09/13/2015 11:20PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (701 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 05:45AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (611 Views) moosepalm 09/14/2015 08:32AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (463 Views) jerry 09/14/2015 10:52AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (626 Views) TGJB 09/14/2015 11:42AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (536 Views) Topcat 09/14/2015 12:17PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (549 Views) P-Dub 09/14/2015 04:40AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (532 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 05:54AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (516 Views) Edgorman 09/14/2015 08:02AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (519 Views) richiebee 09/14/2015 10:54AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (554 Views) P-Dub 09/14/2015 01:06PM
Canterbury (629 Views) Fairmount1 09/14/2015 09:42PM
Re: Canterbury (625 Views) mjellish 09/15/2015 12:10AM
Re: Canterbury (546 Views) miff 09/15/2015 08:31AM
Re: Canterbury (595 Views) TGJB 09/15/2015 12:40PM
Re: Canterbury (541 Views) Gerard 09/15/2015 01:25PM
Re: Canterbury (506 Views) banditbeau 09/15/2015 10:39PM
Re: Canterbury (513 Views) miff 09/16/2015 07:54AM
Re: Canterbury (449 Views) Rick B. 09/16/2015 09:03AM
Re: Canterbury (492 Views) miff 09/16/2015 09:41AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (583 Views) Holybull1 09/11/2015 09:36AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (579 Views) jbelfior 09/11/2015 10:38AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (623 Views) Topcat 09/11/2015 02:23PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (706 Views) miff 09/11/2015 03:18PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (468 Views) belmont3 09/11/2015 10:46PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (504 Views) miff 09/12/2015 07:50AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (593 Views) jma11473 09/12/2015 08:21AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (538 Views) johnnym 09/12/2015 08:37AM
Survey says.............. (648 Views) Breakage 09/12/2015 12:28PM
Re: Survey says.............. (557 Views) Breakage 09/12/2015 12:43PM
Re: Survey says.............. (568 Views) Boscar Obarra 09/12/2015 01:51PM
Some data on fantasy sports and percent of winners (563 Views) Breakage 09/15/2015 07:27PM
Nominal take out 5%-25%-effective take out 50% for 98.3% of players (633 Views) Breakage 09/16/2015 04:55PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (630 Views) miff 09/25/2015 01:56PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (776 Views) P-Dub 09/10/2015 12:40PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (523 Views) asfufh 09/12/2015 10:17AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (562 Views) miff 09/22/2015 11:10AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (515 Views) jbelfior 09/22/2015 02:54PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (587 Views) Boscar Obarra 09/22/2015 04:15PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (617 Views) jma11473 09/22/2015 05:34PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (590 Views) TGJB 09/22/2015 05:43PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (581 Views) miff 09/22/2015 07:28PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (539 Views) Boscar Obarra 09/22/2015 07:57PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (540 Views) Fairmount1 09/15/2015 06:50PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (663 Views) miff 09/16/2015 10:15AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (386 Views) jp702006 09/16/2015 11:18AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (519 Views) Michael D. 09/16/2015 11:57AM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (513 Views) Gerard 09/16/2015 12:11PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (539 Views) richiebee 09/16/2015 12:15PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (522 Views) miff 09/16/2015 12:22PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (705 Views) TGJB 09/16/2015 06:47PM
Re: Racing Don't Need This! (456 Views) gteasy 09/23/2015 12:17AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.