Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024  • 2 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (838 Views)
Posted by: jimbo66 (IP Logged)
Date: June 13, 2016 07:45PM

Sekrah,

Is it your reading or comprehension that has regressed in the last two years?

Pretty sure I didn't say the performance was purely related to the track surface.

As for your question. Of course. Literally 100's of examples. Every year. Horses for courses, and other horses that don't run well at certain courses. Lava Man never ran a number outside california on dirt. Skip away couldn't get a number at Churchill. Many others.

Glad to see your eye has gotten keener. You can see quarter horses sinking into the track like quicksand. Hmm.....

Jim



Subject Written By Posted
Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (1344 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 06:02PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (939 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 06:16PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (954 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 06:39PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (919 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 06:47PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (861 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:10PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (796 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:15PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (815 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (824 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:31PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (905 Views) miff 06/13/2016 07:37PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (785 Views) RICH 06/14/2016 06:07AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (1026 Views) miff 06/13/2016 06:48PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (951 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:21PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (870 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:36PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (783 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 08:16PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (858 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 08:23PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (862 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 08:55PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (853 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 09:28PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (931 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 09:58AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (832 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 10:01AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (786 Views) miff 06/14/2016 10:20AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (821 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 10:51AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (807 Views) miff 06/14/2016 11:40AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (858 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 11:50AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (858 Views) miff 06/14/2016 12:03PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (901 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 12:45PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (816 Views) jimbo66 06/14/2016 12:53PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (710 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 01:39PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (779 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 01:59PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (754 Views) miff 06/14/2016 02:20PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (788 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 02:34PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (831 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 02:43PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (683 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 06:35PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (849 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 07:26PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (712 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 02:25PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (751 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 11:29AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (774 Views) miff 06/14/2016 11:52AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (792 Views) jp702006 06/13/2016 08:34PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (772 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 08:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (887 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:22PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (913 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (838 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:45PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (916 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 08:36PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (589 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 02:20PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (782 Views) miff 06/14/2016 02:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (723 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 03:28PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (791 Views) Tavasco 06/14/2016 03:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (771 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 03:35PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (736 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 03:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (778 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 03:44PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (676 Views) richiebee 06/14/2016 03:57PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (723 Views) sekrah 06/14/2016 05:54PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (715 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 06:25PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.