Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (686 Views)
Posted by: bobphilo (IP Logged)
Date: June 14, 2016 06:35PM

As my "lecture", as you so disdainfully call it, was not clear enough for you let me put it in simpler terms that anyone with half a brain can understand. I was responding to the nonsense claim that the Belmont pace was slow based on the pace of shorter 1-turn races. Not comparable.



Subject Written By Posted
Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (1349 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 06:02PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (942 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 06:16PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (957 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 06:39PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (921 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 06:47PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (863 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:10PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (799 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:15PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (818 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (827 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:31PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (908 Views) miff 06/13/2016 07:37PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (788 Views) RICH 06/14/2016 06:07AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (1030 Views) miff 06/13/2016 06:48PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (953 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 07:21PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (873 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:36PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (785 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 08:16PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (862 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 08:23PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (866 Views) bobphilo 06/13/2016 08:55PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (855 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 09:28PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (934 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 09:58AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (835 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 10:01AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (789 Views) miff 06/14/2016 10:20AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (824 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 10:51AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (812 Views) miff 06/14/2016 11:40AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (860 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 11:50AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (861 Views) miff 06/14/2016 12:03PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (906 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 12:45PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (819 Views) jimbo66 06/14/2016 12:53PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (713 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 01:39PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (782 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 01:59PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (757 Views) miff 06/14/2016 02:20PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (790 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2016 02:34PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (834 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 02:43PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (686 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 06:35PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (852 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 07:26PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (714 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 02:25PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (754 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 11:29AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (777 Views) miff 06/14/2016 11:52AM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (802 Views) jp702006 06/13/2016 08:34PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (775 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 08:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (890 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:22PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (915 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 07:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (841 Views) jimbo66 06/13/2016 07:45PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (918 Views) sekrah 06/13/2016 08:36PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (591 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 02:20PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (785 Views) miff 06/14/2016 02:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (726 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 03:28PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (793 Views) Tavasco 06/14/2016 03:30PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (773 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 03:35PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (740 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 03:38PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (782 Views) TGJB 06/14/2016 03:44PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (679 Views) richiebee 06/14/2016 03:57PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (728 Views) sekrah 06/14/2016 05:54PM
Re: Did Exaggerator not like Belmont Surface? (717 Views) bobphilo 06/14/2016 06:25PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.