Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2024 Kentucky Oaks/Derby Days Final Figures Churchill Downs May 3 & May 4, 2024 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (561 Views)
Posted by: (IP Logged)
Date: June 10, 2004 03:40PM

>Smarty tired, absolutely; collapsed, absolutely not.<

OK, we are probably debating language as opposed to what happened. :-)

On the point I was making prior....

If a speed handicapper does not incorporate certain negative aspects of horses' trips into their figures, they would have a tendency to build them into their track variant instead.

That would have the effect of overrating the speed figures of other horses in the race that had easier trips.

If you do that enough over a long period of time, it would tend to produce figures that were rising slowly over the long haul even though the horses were not improving.



Post Edited (06-10-04 15:45)



Subject Written By Posted
Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (894 Views) TGJB 06/08/2004 04:53PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (487 Views) miff 06/08/2004 05:05PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (522 Views) thomas 06/09/2004 06:20PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (468 Views) TGJB 06/09/2004 07:13PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (455 Views) thomas 06/09/2004 09:05PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (566 Views) marcus 06/08/2004 08:21PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (484 Views) TGJB 06/09/2004 01:23PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (455 Views) fasteddie 06/09/2004 01:41PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (523 Views) marcus 06/09/2004 09:08PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (493 Views) jbelfior 06/09/2004 03:30PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (466 Views) irontank 06/09/2004 04:55PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (523 Views) BitPlayer 06/09/2004 08:14PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (524 Views) 06/10/2004 09:11AM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (579 Views) twoshoes 06/10/2004 10:30AM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (487 Views) 06/10/2004 11:33AM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (568 Views) twoshoes 06/10/2004 12:30PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (507 Views) fasteddie 06/10/2004 01:52PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (575 Views) 06/10/2004 02:06PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (479 Views) fasteddie 06/10/2004 02:32PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (594 Views) 06/10/2004 02:56PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (510 Views) fasteddie 06/10/2004 03:29PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (561 Views) 06/10/2004 03:40PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (415 Views) TGJB 06/10/2004 04:15PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (512 Views) fasteddie 06/11/2004 08:34AM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (427 Views) 06/11/2004 09:33AM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (480 Views) 06/11/2004 09:24AM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (509 Views) marcus 06/09/2004 09:37PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (469 Views) 06/09/2004 07:38PM
Re: Slide? We Don't Need No Stinkin' Slide. (495 Views) TGJB 06/09/2004 08:00PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.