Re: Belmont All Stakes Analysis (1146 Views)
Posted by:
P-Dub (IP Logged)
Date: June 11, 2017 05:48PM
boardedup Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That's fair, the horse was listed below the other
> 3 in the analysis, I guess it's all how you
> interpret information. Like you said, if a horse
> is mentioned as playable in tri boxes and you see
> him at 27-1, it's up to your individual
> handicapping as to whether you take the leap of
> faith and bet him individually or not.
>
> I can say for me personally I doubt he would have
> been high on my radar otherwise, but you're
> totally correct, the analysis did not say to bet
> him to win or across the board or anything like
> that.
>
> My tickets are basically never a carbon copy of
> the analysis given though, it helps confirm or
> dismiss possible plays and more so acts as a
> starting point for betting a race. I'd have to
> think that's pretty much par for the course around
> here though.
If the analysis has 4 horses listed in a box, basically saying none stand out, no problem with someone taking the longest price for a win wager.
P-Dub