Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  TG Final Figures for BC 2019 Santa Anita 11/1 & 11/2 2019 
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
Email notification when your horse races
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Historical races and handicapping articles
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Ground loss (714 Views)
Posted by: rezlegal (IP Logged)
Date: June 11, 2019 10:44AM

From a handicapping point of view it is fair to ask what good does it do for any Tgraph player when we learn that none of the winners of the triple crown races ran the fastest Tgraph number? I presume every single person who has posted on this board has a basic understanding as to how important ground loss is in the computation of the final figure. With respect to Tacitus- solely as an example- his numbers going into the race could certainly lead a Tgraph player to conclude that if he “ran to his number” he was a likely winner. But as TGJB has stressed on numerous occasions, the use of the Tgraph sheets does NOT eliminate the need for handicapping. While it seems like red boarding ( I did not bet) would it not be reasonable to conclude going into the Belmont that Tacitus would lose ground from the outside? No one can foresee how much ground or whether Ortiz was so confident he could go wide both runs and win, but certainly there was no basis to conclude Tacitus would save ground— he might have but you could not go into the race with such a believe. Which leads to a second point- now that we are armed with a number for Tacitus- earned because of ground loss, how will that help me or any of us in future races? If he draws wide in the Jim Dandy or Travers and is bet down to favoritism, does a handicapper conclude he is “fastest” ( putting developmental patterns aside) and the most likely winner. The only point I am trying to make is that as wonderful as TGJBs product is- I cannot bet $2 without it- there is always a need to “work”, i.e. handicap. It is up to all of us to use the”data” provided - the question we often hear - “ Who do the sheets like? is not the right question ( putting the TGraph analysis aside).The only question is who do you like and Why?

Subject Written By Posted
Ground loss (886 Views) TGJB 06/10/2019 04:06PM
Re: Ground loss (668 Views) Silver Charm 06/10/2019 04:39PM
Re: Ground loss (513 Views) jbelfior 06/11/2019 07:40AM
Re: Ground loss (553 Views) Silver Charm 06/11/2019 08:31AM
Re: Ground loss (714 Views) rezlegal 06/11/2019 10:44AM
Re: Ground loss (508 Views) Boscar Obarra 06/11/2019 12:12PM
Re: Ground loss (349 Views) Mstrlucky74 06/13/2019 09:05PM
Re: Ground loss (337 Views) hellersorr 06/13/2019 11:40PM
Re: Ground loss (327 Views) Rich Curtis 06/14/2019 12:51PM
Re: Ground loss (334 Views) Socalman3 06/14/2019 08:48AM
Re: Ground loss (279 Views) johnnym 06/14/2019 09:56AM
Re: Ground loss (303 Views) BitPlayer 06/14/2019 11:39AM

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.