Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  2023 Breeders' Cup Days Final Figures Santa Anita 3-4 November 2023  • 1 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: SGF-1000 (702 Views)
Posted by: BitPlayer (IP Logged)
Date: March 12, 2020 11:17AM

Frank -

Thanks. I had seen this article before, but went back and read it more carefully after you posted the link. Natalie Voss does good work, going deeper than most horse racing writers. Even here, however, the discussion of SGF-1000 is mostly about what claims are made, not about evidence of what it contains or does. People seem to be treating it as Jason Servis's "juice." Rick Arthur expresses skepticism about how effective it is in his interview, and Chuck Simon seemed to do the same on Steve Byk's show yesterday.

One possibility is that it is like chondroitin and glucosamine, which are natural chemicals found in joint cartilage and also marketed in supplements. A lot of people swear by the supplements as a means of reducing joint pain. The evidence seems to be that, in most cases, the supplement is no more effective than a placebo.

Another possibility is that SGF-1000 contains the growth factors described in the indictment and that those growth factors enhance performance by improving joint health.

A third possibility is that either the growth factors mentioned or some other unidentified components improve performance or endurance by another means. I am reminded of a friend who had prostate cancer and opted against a doctor-recommended treatment (due to virility effects) in favor or an herbal concoction that brought his PSA levels down. It turns out the herbal concoction had something in it that only affected detected PSA levels and not the underlying cancer, which metastasized to his brain.

I am not trying to defend Jason Servis or to deny that he got improbable jump-ups. I've never been on a backside, but I get the impression that a lot of random experimentation with poorly understood treatments goes on there. A more controlled environment, with a better understanding by all of what is and should be used and what effects result, would be preferable.



Subject Written By Posted
Rick Arthur in TDN (1295 Views) BitPlayer 03/11/2020 03:10PM
Re: Rick Arthur in TDN (614 Views) FrankD. 03/11/2020 04:10PM
Re: SGF-1000 (702 Views) BitPlayer 03/12/2020 11:17AM
Re: SGF-1000 (577 Views) BitPlayer 03/13/2020 02:56PM
Re: SGF-1000 (639 Views) wrongly1 03/13/2020 08:18PM
Re: SGF-1000 (580 Views) BitPlayer 03/13/2020 09:42PM
Re: SGF-1000 (500 Views) NoCarolinaTony 03/14/2020 12:46PM
Re: Rick Arthur in TDN (636 Views) Caradoc 03/11/2020 04:44PM
Re: Rick Arthur in TDN (594 Views) JohnTChance 03/11/2020 05:45PM
Re: Rick Arthur in TDN (672 Views) BitPlayer 03/11/2020 06:09PM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.