Slam dunk? Every time there is a defender on the court, the theory gets swatted into the stands. Among a million other things, there are problems with the timing/death, problems with the presumed motives for anonymity, and crippling problems with the writing styles. I realize that proponents of the theory are well practiced at bending themselves into pretzels in order to explain away all the objections, but whatever all this bending adds up to, it does not add up to a slam dunk. I suspect that what is really going on here is that you are trying to smuggle class handicapping onto this board.