Re: Baffert Should Be Afforded Due Process (641 Views)
Posted by:
Strike (IP Logged)
Date: May 11, 2021 02:50PM
rezlegal Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> If the split sample confirms the results of the
> first, can you explain to the Board why, exactly,
> the charges will be dropped? Is there an exception
> in the regs that if the steroid enters the horses
> system through his behind ( assuming arguendo that
> was the sole source of entry) rather than his
> ankle it’s ok?
100% agree with you counselor.
I haven't read any speculation as to why Baffert jumped the gun and admitted the positive before the split sample was tested. Not normal procedure. He explains "transparency" and other nonsense but there must be a well thought out strategy for doing so by his lawyer (who we are all becoming much too familiar with over the years).