Re: More Baffert (262 Views)
Posted by: rezlegal
Date: January 04, 2022 07:04PM
Bit- it is sort of laches! As a general rules the party asserting the doctrine of laches-here Churchill Downs- would have to claim it was prejudiced or changed its position by Baffert sitting on his rights. That is not the case here where CD has taken its position. I can’t speak for Kentucky courts specifically but most judges do not look fondly on a party seeking a TRO at the last minute when the relief could have been sought earlier on a non emergency basis.R
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.