Your Ask The Experts ID
is separate from your
Order Online Account ID
 Race of the Week:  The Modesty Stakes Churchill May 3, 2024  • 2 Specials Available
Order Online
Buy TG Data
Complete Menu of
TG Data products
Simulcast Books
Customize a Value
Package of Select
TG Data
Sheet Requests
Order The Last Figure for Any Horse
Free Products
Redboard Room
Download and Review previous days' data.
Race of the Week
With detailed comments
ThoroTrack
Email notification when your horse races
Information
Introduction
For newcomers.
Samples and Tutorials
For Horsemen
Consulting services and Graph Racing
Sales Sites
Where to buy TG around the country
Archives
Historical races and handicapping articles
Handicapping
Hall of Fame
Major handicapping contest winners
Home Page
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (487 Views)
Posted by: TGJB (IP Logged)
Date: November 14, 2004 02:54PM

Jim--

1-- You are redboarding, whether you had the winner or not. If you have a problem with our opinions, say so before the race.

2-- WE ARE NOT MAKING PICKS IN ROTW. Your paraphrase of my statement is probably close enough, and it doesn't contradict what I just said. This is a game of percentages-- if we say a horse is about 5/2 to win, and the public makes him even money, he is not a bet, and if they make him 4-1, he is, whatever the result. Obviously, ROTW gave Wegalia a good chance to win (maybe the best chance), so the position could be articulated as, strong contender, possibly most likely winner, but underlay at a short price. What's the problem?

3-- We do make picks, every day, and they can be examined the next day in the RBR for free. They include a minimum odds guidline for just the reasons found above. As you say, others in similar positions are not willing to put themselves on the record, and we have an overall body of work over the years several thousand times as large as the 13 race sampling you are referring too, aside from your misrepresentation of it as winning and losing, which can't be done except in conjunction with an odds board.

4-- The ROTW isn't about EITHER altruism or betting value, although in the long term it definitely has had a lot of the latter if you worked out an odds line based on it. (And by the way, we invite everyone to look at the American Oaks ROTW Jim refers to, and to decide whom we liked, see what the winner paid, and see how many weeks of "losers" that would pay for). ROTW is an attempt to educate people as to how to use the most powerful and complete handicapping tool on the market-- it's a free weekly mini-seminar that generally attracts around 5-600 viewers, depending on what race we choose.

5-- Jim, I don't get why you, and only you, keep going on about this. It's a free sample. You can use it or not, but either way we ain't getting a dime from you for it whether you win or lose. If you have something to say about the race itself or our opinion, say so before the fact. Resulting is a cheap shot, especially when you ain't paying for it.



TGJB



Subject Written By Posted
Consistency in the ROTW (822 Views) jimbo66 11/13/2004 04:34PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (440 Views) TGJB 11/13/2004 05:28PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (461 Views) spa 11/13/2004 06:52PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (542 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/13/2004 07:31PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (477 Views) jimbo66 11/14/2004 01:00AM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (493 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/14/2004 01:58AM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (555 Views) spa 11/14/2004 10:28AM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (469 Views) jimbo66 11/14/2004 11:58AM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (492 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/14/2004 12:23PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (490 Views) jimbo66 11/14/2004 12:32PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (487 Views) TGJB 11/14/2004 02:54PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (461 Views) jimbo66 11/15/2004 10:11AM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (525 Views) Michael D. 11/15/2004 11:59AM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (548 Views) jimbo66 11/15/2004 01:37PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (432 Views) TGJB 11/15/2004 01:56PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (450 Views) jimbo66 11/15/2004 02:31PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (435 Views) TGJB 11/15/2004 02:54PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (424 Views) jimbo66 11/15/2004 03:01PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (505 Views) TGJB 11/15/2004 03:41PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (512 Views) jimbo66 11/15/2004 04:56PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (444 Views) TGJB 11/15/2004 05:26PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (511 Views) twoshoes 11/15/2004 02:59PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (476 Views) Pheobe 11/14/2004 12:12PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (525 Views) jimbo66 11/14/2004 12:16PM
Re: Consistency in the ROTW (464 Views) HP 11/15/2004 11:36AM
Numbers thrown into the Hat (497 Views) Chuckles_the_Clown2 11/15/2004 11:51AM


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
This forum powered by Phorum.

Thoro-Graph 180 Varick Street New York, NY 10014 ---- Click here for the Ask The Experts Archives.