Michael, I have gone to great lengths not to call you names or characterize some truly astounding comments that have come from you. You will do the same if you want to continue to post here.

The responses I have gotten (and not gotten) to my posts about the more complex aspects of figure making, which are not easily demonstrable to the lay person, have indicated that an awful lot of those who have not made figures don't get it, independent of whether they agree. Some do get it. You read that sentence to say ALL? That's on you. You want to quibble about whether the number represents a majority? Have a good time.

The point is that I therefore have focused when possible on items that show an error that no one can fail to understand, or situations that demonstrate the silliness of the the Ragozin "logic", or contradictions within that "logic".

And you know what? The proof that I am right about the Ragozin guys has come in their response to these points, which they know about because they read this board. Do you know how many posts Ragozin got asking about the TOTB BC ground? Zero. They got exactly one question (from Beau) asking about the Derby lengths, and he backed off when they gave him a flat denial with nothing to back it up, despite the evidence I presented.

Over the last couple of days I have presented compelling evidence here that those guys made very significant errors with the data for the two biggest days of the year (and there was another one with the ground for the Distaff that I haven't bothered to go into). There has been not one post on the Ragozin board asking about that, from the guys who PAY for that data.

Who is stupid?



TGJB