Re: Just For The Hell Of It (510 Views)
Posted by:
Michael D. (IP Logged)
Date: December 09, 2004 03:57PM
the last post got to you ehh? (despite your "rest your case" line, i thought it just might, especially the part about northern dancer). evidence comes from my observations using your product for about three years, and the other guy's for a shortly lesser period. the main difference in methodology involves using changing variants throughout the day. from my observations, you are more willing to change a variant if you think most of the horses in a race ran contrary to what their current form and pattern would suggest, while ragozin is less likely to change the variant unless he can point to a specific change in the track. i do not save old sheets, and would not dig them up if i did, it's just not important enough for me to prove anything here. when the good racing starts up again, however, i will gladly pop in an give the evidence i see (aqu inner is not my thing, and the good crc racing has ended). in all due respect, the ragozin people i know have no interest in posting on your BB. you can trust me, or go on assuming "most" of them are idiots (assuming your competitors customers are idiots, and questioning their IQ?? hmmm, an odd business practice). i'm sure you will go with the ladder, but i really don't care.
and for full disclosure sake, i use both products. more so ragozin now, but overall more experience with TG.